Showing posts with label silliness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label silliness. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 29, 2021
Take Dada Daily for Best Results
"The times are dark and hard, and I know no better means to overcome the chaos of the day than reading about Dadaist appearances.” Rudolf Lothar, “Der Dadaismus.” Neues Wiener Tagblatt, 3 October 1918.
Friday, August 2, 2019
And How Many of these Literary Fiction Tropes Do You Use?
This little checklist, on Electric Lit, caught my eye: Who Needs an MFA When You Have This Literary Fiction Trope Checklist?
As a non-MFA writer of literary fiction (and one whose first story was published before quite a few of today's adults were even born--yes, I'm admitting to being ancient, as I have a big birthday coming up), I could not resist taking a look. The 25 tropes are amusing in their way. The author suggests that if one can manage to cram all 25 into one story, one might even snag a Pulitzer.
Aha, now we know why I have not yet won a Pulitzer for the fiction that has been appearing in various little magazines over the past few decades!
I am pretty sure that the only one of these tropes that I have ever perpetrated was #10, "Woman who looks good without trying compared to female protagonist who looks bad despite trying." I feel mildly guilty at having ever included such a thing--why couldn't I have done #21, "Dogs bark in distance," instead? But I know I do have one instance of #10 in one of the close-to-done novels and I am not taking it out, because it's very brief and I think it works.
Oh, and I may possibly have used #22, "Upset character barfs," in a story I wrote during my freshman year of college. I kind of think I did, because I had a good friend who barfed when upset and I found that strange and evocative back then.
It's also true that I've had characters look out the window relatively early in the story (#2, "Starts with character looking out of window, describing scenery"), but not immediately upon waking (#1, "Starts with character waking up"). Perhaps I'm closer to Pulitzer-dom than I had thought.
Still, I just can't see myself ever using #16, "Villain who is kind to pet." My stories just don't really go in for villains, other than one I wrote at the age of 11 which involved a hyper-lustful nobleman in an imaginary world. The number of times Lord Evil managed to rape the Angry and Plucky Protagonist alongside the road in a short period of time made clear that the story was decidedly set in another world. I don't recall him being cruel to his horse, but I doubt he was kind to pets beyond making sure that the horse was properly maintained for jousting and such.
#15, "White savior," is also not likely to happen in my fiction unless we interpret this fairly broadly. I mean, I'm not likely to employ a "Black savior," a "Brown savior," or a "Yellow" or "Red savior" either. Saviors just aren't my kind of fictional trope. Well, apart from that one of my protagonists mentioned Warner Sallman's much-reproduced painting Christ at Heart's Door as a common household ornament. If you are my relative and are reading this, I am sure you know this work well, whether or not you know its name or artist.
Finally, #3, "Protagonist is writer with writer’s block," is very unlikely to crop up in my fiction. I admit that I should try to make my protagonists less like myself (and some of them certainly are strongly unlike me), but the only time I had a serious case of writer's block, I cured it by starting a different writing project. So all right, as a result of doing that I lost Agent #2 because I never finished the book I'd become blocked on, but win some, lose some. I just don't have much desire to write about protagonists who have writer's block. (Other characters with writer's block, perhaps. Minor characters. Not protagonists.)
And now we can see why I am not headed for a Pulitzer, and apparently also why I am not yet a household name among the North American literati.
As a non-MFA writer of literary fiction (and one whose first story was published before quite a few of today's adults were even born--yes, I'm admitting to being ancient, as I have a big birthday coming up), I could not resist taking a look. The 25 tropes are amusing in their way. The author suggests that if one can manage to cram all 25 into one story, one might even snag a Pulitzer.
Aha, now we know why I have not yet won a Pulitzer for the fiction that has been appearing in various little magazines over the past few decades!
I am pretty sure that the only one of these tropes that I have ever perpetrated was #10, "Woman who looks good without trying compared to female protagonist who looks bad despite trying." I feel mildly guilty at having ever included such a thing--why couldn't I have done #21, "Dogs bark in distance," instead? But I know I do have one instance of #10 in one of the close-to-done novels and I am not taking it out, because it's very brief and I think it works.
Oh, and I may possibly have used #22, "Upset character barfs," in a story I wrote during my freshman year of college. I kind of think I did, because I had a good friend who barfed when upset and I found that strange and evocative back then.
It's also true that I've had characters look out the window relatively early in the story (#2, "Starts with character looking out of window, describing scenery"), but not immediately upon waking (#1, "Starts with character waking up"). Perhaps I'm closer to Pulitzer-dom than I had thought.
Still, I just can't see myself ever using #16, "Villain who is kind to pet." My stories just don't really go in for villains, other than one I wrote at the age of 11 which involved a hyper-lustful nobleman in an imaginary world. The number of times Lord Evil managed to rape the Angry and Plucky Protagonist alongside the road in a short period of time made clear that the story was decidedly set in another world. I don't recall him being cruel to his horse, but I doubt he was kind to pets beyond making sure that the horse was properly maintained for jousting and such.
#15, "White savior," is also not likely to happen in my fiction unless we interpret this fairly broadly. I mean, I'm not likely to employ a "Black savior," a "Brown savior," or a "Yellow" or "Red savior" either. Saviors just aren't my kind of fictional trope. Well, apart from that one of my protagonists mentioned Warner Sallman's much-reproduced painting Christ at Heart's Door as a common household ornament. If you are my relative and are reading this, I am sure you know this work well, whether or not you know its name or artist.
Finally, #3, "Protagonist is writer with writer’s block," is very unlikely to crop up in my fiction. I admit that I should try to make my protagonists less like myself (and some of them certainly are strongly unlike me), but the only time I had a serious case of writer's block, I cured it by starting a different writing project. So all right, as a result of doing that I lost Agent #2 because I never finished the book I'd become blocked on, but win some, lose some. I just don't have much desire to write about protagonists who have writer's block. (Other characters with writer's block, perhaps. Minor characters. Not protagonists.)
And now we can see why I am not headed for a Pulitzer, and apparently also why I am not yet a household name among the North American literati.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)